The limit of a function f ( x ) f(x) f ( x ) as x x x approaches a a a is the value that f ( x ) f(x) f ( x ) approaches, regardless Of whether f ( a ) f(a) f ( a ) is defined:
lim x → a f ( x ) = L \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L x → a lim f ( x ) = L This means that as x x x gets arbitrarily close to a a a , f ( x ) f(x) f ( x ) gets arbitrarily close to L L L .
A two-sided limit exists if and only if both one-sided limits exist and are equal:
lim x → a f ( x ) = L ⟺ lim x → a − f ( x ) = lim x → a + f ( x ) = L \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L \iff \lim_{x \to a^-} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a^+} f(x) = L x → a lim f ( x ) = L ⟺ x → a − lim f ( x ) = x → a + lim f ( x ) = L Note
Example Find lim x → 0 ∣ x ∣ x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{|x|}{x} x → 0 lim x ∣ x ∣ .
lim x → 0 − ∣ x ∣ x = lim x → 0 − − x x = − 1 \lim_{x \to 0^-} \frac{|x|}{x} = \lim_{x \to 0^-} \frac{-x}{x} = -1 x → 0 − lim x ∣ x ∣ = x → 0 − lim x − x = − 1 lim x → 0 + ∣ x ∣ x = lim x → 0 + x x = 1 \lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac{|x|}{x} = \lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac{x}{x} = 1 x → 0 + lim x ∣ x ∣ = x → 0 + lim x x = 1 Since the one-sided limits are not equal, the limit does not exist.
Note
Example Find lim x → 3 ∣ x − 3 ∣ x − 3 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 3} \frac{|x - 3|}{x - 3} x → 3 lim x − 3 ∣ x − 3∣ .
For x < 3 x \lt 3 x < 3 : ∣ x − 3 ∣ x − 3 = 3 − x x − 3 = − 1 \frac{|x-3|}{x-3} = \frac{3-x}{x-3} = -1 x − 3 ∣ x − 3∣ = x − 3 3 − x = − 1 .
For x > 3 x \gt 3 x > 3 : ∣ x − 3 ∣ x − 3 = x − 3 x − 3 = 1 \frac{|x-3|}{x-3} = \frac{x-3}{x-3} = 1 x − 3 ∣ x − 3∣ = x − 3 x − 3 = 1 .
Left limit = − 1 = -1 = − 1 Right limit = 1 = 1 = 1 . The limit does not exist.
Limit Value lim x → 0 sin x x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} x → 0 lim x sin x 1 1 1 lim x → 0 1 − cos x x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1 - \cos x}{x} x → 0 lim x 1 − cos x 0 0 0 lim x → ∞ 1 x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{x} x → ∞ lim x 1 0 0 0 lim x → ∞ ( 1 + 1 x ) x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \infty} \left(1 + \frac{1}{x}\right)^x x → ∞ lim ( 1 + x 1 ) x e e e lim x → 0 e x − 1 x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - 1}{x} x → 0 lim x e x − 1 1 1 1 lim x → 0 ln ( 1 + x ) x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\ln(1+x)}{x} x → 0 lim x ln ( 1 + x ) 1 1 1
Proof that lim x → 0 sin x x = 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} = 1 x → 0 lim x sin x = 1 .
This is proved using the squeeze theorem and the geometric inequality sin x < x < tan x \sin x \lt x \lt \tan x sin x < x < tan x for 0 < x < π 2 0 \lt x \lt \frac{\pi}{2} 0 < x < 2 π Which gives cos x < sin x x < 1 \cos x \lt \frac{\sin x}{x} \lt 1 cos x < x s i n x < 1 .
As x → 0 + x \to 0^+ x → 0 + , cos x → 1 \cos x \to 1 cos x → 1 So by the squeeze theorem, sin x x → 1 \frac{\sin x}{x} \to 1 x s i n x → 1 . A similar Argument applies from the left. ■ \blacksquare ■
Proof of the geometric inequality sin x < x < tan x \sin x \lt x \lt \tan x sin x < x < tan x for 0 < x < π 2 0 \lt x \lt \frac{\pi}{2} 0 < x < 2 π . Consider a unit circle sector with angle x x x . The area of triangle O A P OAP O A P (with altitude sin x \sin x sin x ) is 1 2 sin x \frac{1}{2}\sin x 2 1 sin x The area of the sector is 1 2 x \frac{1}{2}x 2 1 x And the area of triangle O A T OAT O A T (with Altitude tan x \tan x tan x ) is 1 2 tan x \frac{1}{2}\tan x 2 1 tan x . Since the sector contains the first triangle and is Contained in the second, we get 1 2 sin x < 1 2 x < 1 2 tan x \frac{1}{2}\sin x \lt \frac{1}{2}x \lt \frac{1}{2}\tan x 2 1 sin x < 2 1 x < 2 1 tan x Hence sin x < x < tan x \sin x \lt x \lt \tan x sin x < x < tan x . ■ \blacksquare ■
Proof that lim x → 0 e x − 1 x = 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - 1}{x} = 1 x → 0 lim x e x − 1 = 1 .
Let h = e x − 1 h = e^x - 1 h = e x − 1 So e x = 1 + h e^x = 1 + h e x = 1 + h and x = ln ( 1 + h ) x = \ln(1+h) x = ln ( 1 + h ) . As x → 0 x \to 0 x → 0 , h → 0 h \to 0 h → 0 .
e x − 1 x = h ln ( 1 + h ) = 1 ln ( 1 + h ) h \frac{e^x - 1}{x} = \frac{h}{\ln(1+h)} = \frac{1}{\frac{\ln(1+h)}{h}} x e x − 1 = ln ( 1 + h ) h = h l n ( 1 + h ) 1 Since lim h → 0 ln ( 1 + h ) h = 1 \displaystyle\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\ln(1+h)}{h} = 1 h → 0 lim h ln ( 1 + h ) = 1 (which follows from lim x → 0 e x − 1 x = 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - 1}{x} = 1 x → 0 lim x e x − 1 = 1 and the fact that ln \ln ln and exp \exp exp are Inverses), we obtain the result. ■ \blacksquare ■
Proof that lim x → 0 ln ( 1 + x ) x = 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\ln(1+x)}{x} = 1 x → 0 lim x ln ( 1 + x ) = 1 .
Let u = ln ( 1 + x ) u = \ln(1+x) u = ln ( 1 + x ) So e u = 1 + x e^u = 1 + x e u = 1 + x and x = e u − 1 x = e^u - 1 x = e u − 1 . As x → 0 x \to 0 x → 0 , u → 0 u \to 0 u → 0 .
ln ( 1 + x ) x = u e u − 1 = 1 e u − 1 u \frac{\ln(1+x)}{x} = \frac{u}{e^u - 1} = \frac{1}{\frac{e^u - 1}{u}} x ln ( 1 + x ) = e u − 1 u = u e u − 1 1 Since lim u → 0 e u − 1 u = 1 \displaystyle\lim_{u \to 0} \frac{e^u - 1}{u} = 1 u → 0 lim u e u − 1 = 1 The result follows. ■ \blacksquare ■
If g ( x ) ≤ f ( x ) ≤ h ( x ) g(x) \le f(x) \le h(x) g ( x ) ≤ f ( x ) ≤ h ( x ) for all x x x near a a a (except possibly at a a a ), and:
lim x → a g ( x ) = lim x → a h ( x ) = L \lim_{x \to a} g(x) = \lim_{x \to a} h(x) = L x → a lim g ( x ) = x → a lim h ( x ) = L Then lim x → a f ( x ) = L \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L x → a lim f ( x ) = L .
Intuition: If f f f is sandwiched between two functions that both approach L L L Then f f f must also Approach L L L . The squeeze theorem is particularly useful when f f f oscillates or is otherwise hard to Evaluate directly.
Note
Example Show that lim x → 0 x 2 sin ( 1 x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x^2 \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = 0 x → 0 lim x 2 sin ( x 1 ) = 0 .
Since − 1 ≤ sin ( 1 x ) ≤ 1 -1 \le \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \le 1 − 1 ≤ sin ( x 1 ) ≤ 1 We have − x 2 ≤ x 2 sin ( 1 x ) ≤ x 2 -x^2 \le x^2 \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \le x^2 − x 2 ≤ x 2 sin ( x 1 ) ≤ x 2 .
Both lim x → 0 ( − x 2 ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0}(-x^2) = 0 x → 0 lim ( − x 2 ) = 0 and lim x → 0 x 2 = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x^2 = 0 x → 0 lim x 2 = 0 .
By the squeeze theorem, lim x → 0 x 2 sin ( 1 x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x^2 \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = 0 x → 0 lim x 2 sin ( x 1 ) = 0 .
Note
Example Show that lim x → 0 x cos ( 1 x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = 0 x → 0 lim x cos ( x 1 ) = 0 .
Since − 1 ≤ cos ( 1 x ) ≤ 1 -1 \le \cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \le 1 − 1 ≤ cos ( x 1 ) ≤ 1 We have − ∣ x ∣ ≤ x cos ( 1 x ) ≤ ∣ x ∣ -|x| \le x\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \le |x| − ∣ x ∣ ≤ x cos ( x 1 ) ≤ ∣ x ∣ .
Both lim x → 0 ( − ∣ x ∣ ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0}(-|x|) = 0 x → 0 lim ( − ∣ x ∣ ) = 0 and lim x → 0 ∣ x ∣ = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0}|x| = 0 x → 0 lim ∣ x ∣ = 0 .
By the squeeze theorem, the limit is 0 0 0 .
Note
Example Show that lim x → 0 x 2 e sin ( 1 / x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x^2 e^{\sin(1/x)} = 0 x → 0 lim x 2 e s i n ( 1/ x ) = 0 .
Since − 1 ≤ sin ( 1 / x ) ≤ 1 -1 \le \sin(1/x) \le 1 − 1 ≤ sin ( 1/ x ) ≤ 1 We have e − 1 ≤ e sin ( 1 / x ) ≤ e 1 e^{-1} \le e^{\sin(1/x)} \le e^1 e − 1 ≤ e s i n ( 1/ x ) ≤ e 1 .
Therefore:
E − 1 x 2 ≤ x 2 e sin ( 1 / x ) ≤ e ⋅ x 2 E^{-1} x^2 \le x^2 e^{\sin(1/x)} \le e \cdot x^2 E − 1 x 2 ≤ x 2 e s i n ( 1/ x ) ≤ e ⋅ x 2 Both lim x → 0 e − 1 x 2 = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} e^{-1} x^2 = 0 x → 0 lim e − 1 x 2 = 0 and lim x → 0 e ⋅ x 2 = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} e \cdot x^2 = 0 x → 0 lim e ⋅ x 2 = 0 .
By the squeeze theorem, the limit is 0 0 0 .
If lim x → a f ( x ) = L \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L x → a lim f ( x ) = L and lim x → a g ( x ) = M \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} g(x) = M x → a lim g ( x ) = M Then:
lim x → a [ f ( x ) + g ( x ) ] = L + M \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} [f(x) + g(x)] = L + M x → a lim [ f ( x ) + g ( x )] = L + M lim x → a [ f ( x ) − g ( x ) ] = L − M \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} [f(x) - g(x)] = L - M x → a lim [ f ( x ) − g ( x )] = L − M lim x → a [ c ⋅ f ( x ) ] = c L \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} [c \cdot f(x)] = cL x → a lim [ c ⋅ f ( x )] = c L lim x → a [ f ( x ) ⋅ g ( x ) ] = L ⋅ M \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} [f(x) \cdot g(x)] = L \cdot M x → a lim [ f ( x ) ⋅ g ( x )] = L ⋅ M lim x → a f ( x ) g ( x ) = L M \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac{L}{M} x → a lim g ( x ) f ( x ) = M L Provided M ≠ 0 M \ne 0 M = 0 Theorem (Limit of a power). If lim x → a f ( x ) = L \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L x → a lim f ( x ) = L and n n n is a positive Integer, then lim x → a [ f ( x ) ] n = L n \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} [f(x)]^n = L^n x → a lim [ f ( x ) ] n = L n .
Theorem (Limit of a root). If lim x → a f ( x ) = L \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L x → a lim f ( x ) = L and n n n is a positive Integer, and L ≥ 0 L \ge 0 L ≥ 0 when n n n is even, then lim x → a f ( x ) n = L n \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} \sqrt[n]{f(x)} = \sqrt[n]{L} x → a lim n f ( x ) = n L .
Proof of property 1 (sum rule). We need to show that for every ϵ > 0 \epsilon \gt 0 ϵ > 0 There exists δ > 0 \delta \gt 0 δ > 0 such that ∣ x − a ∣ < δ |x - a| \lt \delta ∣ x − a ∣ < δ implies ∣ ( f + g ) ( x ) − ( L + M ) ∣ < ϵ |(f+g)(x) - (L+M)| \lt \epsilon ∣ ( f + g ) ( x ) − ( L + M ) ∣ < ϵ .
Note that ∣ ( f + g ) ( x ) − ( L + M ) ∣ = ∣ ( f ( x ) − L ) + ( g ( x ) − M ) ∣ ≤ ∣ f ( x ) − L ∣ + ∣ g ( x ) − M ∣ |(f+g)(x) - (L+M)| = |(f(x) - L) + (g(x) - M)| \le |f(x) - L| + |g(x) - M| ∣ ( f + g ) ( x ) − ( L + M ) ∣ = ∣ ( f ( x ) − L ) + ( g ( x ) − M ) ∣ ≤ ∣ f ( x ) − L ∣ + ∣ g ( x ) − M ∣ .
Choose δ 1 \delta_1 δ 1 so that ∣ x − a ∣ < δ 1 |x-a| \lt \delta_1 ∣ x − a ∣ < δ 1 implies ∣ f ( x ) − L ∣ < ϵ / 2 |f(x)-L| \lt \epsilon/2 ∣ f ( x ) − L ∣ < ϵ /2 . Choose δ 2 \delta_2 δ 2 So that ∣ x − a ∣ < δ 2 |x-a| \lt \delta_2 ∣ x − a ∣ < δ 2 implies ∣ g ( x ) − M ∣ < ϵ / 2 |g(x)-M| \lt \epsilon/2 ∣ g ( x ) − M ∣ < ϵ /2 . Let δ = min ( δ 1 , δ 2 ) \delta = \min(\delta_1, \delta_2) δ = min ( δ 1 , δ 2 ) . Then ∣ x − a ∣ < δ |x-a| \lt \delta ∣ x − a ∣ < δ implies both bounds hold, so ∣ ( f + g ) ( x ) − ( L + M ) ∣ < ϵ / 2 + ϵ / 2 = ϵ |(f+g)(x) - (L+M)| \lt \epsilon/2 + \epsilon/2 = \epsilon ∣ ( f + g ) ( x ) − ( L + M ) ∣ < ϵ /2 + ϵ /2 = ϵ . ■ \blacksquare ■
When a function is continuous at a a a The limit equals the function value:
lim x → a f ( x ) = f ( a ) \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a) x → a lim f ( x ) = f ( a ) For rational functions P ( x ) Q ( x ) \displaystyle\frac{P(x)}{Q(x)} Q ( x ) P ( x ) where P P P and Q Q Q are polynomials:
If deg P < deg Q \deg P \lt \deg Q deg P < deg Q : lim x → ± ∞ P ( x ) Q ( x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \pm\infty} \frac{P(x)}{Q(x)} = 0 x → ± ∞ lim Q ( x ) P ( x ) = 0 If deg P = deg Q \deg P = \deg Q deg P = deg Q : \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \pm\infty} \frac{P(x)}{Q(x)} = \frac{\mathrm{leading coeff of P}{\mathrm{leading coeff of Q} If deg P > deg Q \deg P \gt \deg Q deg P > deg Q : the limit is ± ∞ \pm\infty ± ∞ Why this works. For large x x x The leading term dominates. Dividing numerator and denominator by The highest power of x x x in the denominator, all lower-order terms vanish.
Note
Example Find lim x → ∞ 3 x 2 − 5 x + 2 7 x 2 + x − 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{3x^2 - 5x + 2}{7x^2 + x - 1} x → ∞ lim 7 x 2 + x − 1 3 x 2 − 5 x + 2 .
Since both polynomials are degree 2, the limit equals the ratio of leading coefficients:
lim x ∞ 3 x 2 − 5 x + 2 7 x 2 + x − 1 = 3 7 \lim_{x \infty} \frac{3x^2 - 5x + 2}{7x^2 + x - 1} = \frac{3}{7} x ∞ lim 7 x 2 + x − 1 3 x 2 − 5 x + 2 = 7 3 Note
Example Find lim x → ∞ 5 x 3 − 2 x + 1 4 x 2 + 3 x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{5x^3 - 2x + 1}{4x^2 + 3x} x → ∞ lim 4 x 2 + 3 x 5 x 3 − 2 x + 1 .
Since deg P = 3 > deg Q = 2 \deg P = 3 \gt \deg Q = 2 deg P = 3 > deg Q = 2 The limit is + ∞ +\infty + ∞ .
Note
Example Find lim x → − ∞ 2 x 3 + x 2 − 5 5 x 3 − 3 x + 2 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{2x^3 + x^2 - 5}{5x^3 - 3x + 2} x → − ∞ lim 5 x 3 − 3 x + 2 2 x 3 + x 2 − 5 .
Both polynomials are degree 3. The limit equals the ratio of leading coefficients:
lim x → − ∞ 2 x 3 + x 2 − 5 5 x 3 − 3 x + 2 = 2 5 \lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{2x^3 + x^2 - 5}{5x^3 - 3x + 2} = \frac{2}{5} x → − ∞ lim 5 x 3 − 3 x + 2 2 x 3 + x 2 − 5 = 5 2 This confirms that the same shortcut works for x → − ∞ x \to -\infty x → − ∞ when the degrees are equal.
When direct substitution yields 0 0 \frac{0}{0} 0 0 Algebraic manipulation is required.
Note
Example Find lim x → 1 x 4 − 1 x 2 − 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x^4 - 1}{x^2 - 1} x → 1 lim x 2 − 1 x 4 − 1 .
x 4 − 1 x 2 − 1 = ( x 2 − 1 ) ( x 2 + 1 ) x 2 − 1 = x 2 + 1 \frac{x^4 - 1}{x^2 - 1} = \frac{(x^2-1)(x^2+1)}{x^2 - 1} = x^2 + 1 x 2 − 1 x 4 − 1 = x 2 − 1 ( x 2 − 1 ) ( x 2 + 1 ) = x 2 + 1 For x ≠ ± 1 x \ne \pm 1 x = ± 1 . Therefore:
lim x → 1 x 4 − 1 x 2 − 1 = 1 + 1 = 2 \lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x^4 - 1}{x^2 - 1} = 1 + 1 = 2 x → 1 lim x 2 − 1 x 4 − 1 = 1 + 1 = 2 For expressions involving radicals, multiply by the conjugate.
Note
Example Find lim x → 0 1 + x − 1 − x x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sqrt{1 + x} - \sqrt{1 - x}}{x} x → 0 lim x 1 + x − 1 − x .
Multiply by 1 + x + 1 − x 1 + x + 1 − x \frac{\sqrt{1+x} + \sqrt{1-x}}{\sqrt{1+x} + \sqrt{1-x}} 1 + x + 1 − x 1 + x + 1 − x :
= lim x → 0 ( 1 + x ) − ( 1 − x ) x ( 1 + x + 1 − x ) = lim x → 0 2 x x ( 1 + x + 1 − x ) = 2 1 + 1 = 1 = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{(1 + x) - (1 - x)}{x(\sqrt{1+x} + \sqrt{1-x})} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2x}{x(\sqrt{1+x} + \sqrt{1-x})} = \frac{2}{1 + 1} = 1 = x → 0 lim x ( 1 + x + 1 − x ) ( 1 + x ) − ( 1 − x ) = x → 0 lim x ( 1 + x + 1 − x ) 2 x = 1 + 1 2 = 1 Note
Example Find lim x → 0 sin 3 x x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin 3x}{x} x → 0 lim x sin 3 x .
Rewrite to use the standard limit:
sin 3 x x = 3 ⋅ sin 3 x 3 x → 3 ⋅ 1 = 3 \frac{\sin 3x}{x} = 3 \cdot \frac{\sin 3x}{3x} \to 3 \cdot 1 = 3 x sin 3 x = 3 ⋅ 3 x sin 3 x → 3 ⋅ 1 = 3 When the limit involves a fraction within a fraction, combine the numerator into a single fraction First.
Note
Example Find lim x → 2 1 x − 1 2 x − 2 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{2}}{x - 2} x → 2 lim x − 2 x 1 − 2 1 .
Combine the numerator:
1 x − 1 2 x − 2 = 2 − x 2 x x − 2 = − ( x − 2 ) 2 x ( x − 2 ) = − 1 2 x \frac{\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{2}}{x - 2} = \frac{\frac{2 - x}{2x}}{x - 2} = \frac{-(x-2)}{2x(x-2)} = -\frac{1}{2x} x − 2 x 1 − 2 1 = x − 2 2 x 2 − x = 2 x ( x − 2 ) − ( x − 2 ) = − 2 x 1 Therefore:
lim x → 2 1 x − 1 2 x − 2 = − 1 4 \lim_{x \to 2} \frac{\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{2}}{x - 2} = -\frac{1}{4} x → 2 lim x − 2 x 1 − 2 1 = − 4 1 The precise definition: lim x → a f ( x ) = L \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L x → a lim f ( x ) = L means that for every ϵ > 0 \epsilon \gt 0 ϵ > 0 There exists a δ > 0 \delta \gt 0 δ > 0 such that:
0 < ∣ x − a ∣ < δ ⟹ ∣ f ( x ) − L ∣ < ϵ 0 \lt |x - a| \lt \delta \implies |f(x) - L| \lt \epsilon 0 < ∣ x − a ∣ < δ ⟹ ∣ f ( x ) − L ∣ < ϵ Intuition. Think of it as a game. Your opponent picks ϵ \epsilon ϵ (how close f ( x ) f(x) f ( x ) must be to L L L ). You must respond with δ \delta δ (how close x x x must be to a a a ). If you can always win this Game, the limit exists.
Note
Example Prove that lim x → 3 ( 2 x − 1 ) = 5 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 3} (2x - 1) = 5 x → 3 lim ( 2 x − 1 ) = 5 .
We need to show that for every ϵ > 0 \epsilon \gt 0 ϵ > 0 There exists δ > 0 \delta \gt 0 δ > 0 such that 0 < ∣ x − 3 ∣ < δ ⟹ ∣ ( 2 x − 1 ) − 5 ∣ < ϵ 0 \lt |x - 3| \lt \delta \implies |(2x-1) - 5| \lt \epsilon 0 < ∣ x − 3∣ < δ ⟹ ∣ ( 2 x − 1 ) − 5∣ < ϵ .
Working backwards: ∣ ( 2 x − 1 ) − 5 ∣ = ∣ 2 x − 6 ∣ = 2 ∣ x − 3 ∣ |(2x-1) - 5| = |2x - 6| = 2|x - 3| ∣ ( 2 x − 1 ) − 5∣ = ∣2 x − 6∣ = 2∣ x − 3∣ .
We want 2 ∣ x − 3 ∣ < ϵ 2|x - 3| \lt \epsilon 2∣ x − 3∣ < ϵ So choose δ = ϵ 2 \delta = \frac{\epsilon}{2} δ = 2 ϵ .
Proof. Let ϵ > 0 \epsilon \gt 0 ϵ > 0 . Choose δ = ϵ 2 \delta = \frac{\epsilon}{2} δ = 2 ϵ . Then:
0 < ∣ x − 3 ∣ < δ ⟹ ∣ x − 3 ∣ < ϵ 2 ⟹ 2 ∣ x − 3 ∣ < ϵ ⟹ ∣ ( 2 x − 1 ) − 5 ∣ < ϵ 0 \lt |x - 3| \lt \delta \implies |x - 3| \lt \frac{\epsilon}{2} \implies 2|x - 3| \lt \epsilon \implies |(2x - 1) - 5| \lt \epsilon 0 < ∣ x − 3∣ < δ ⟹ ∣ x − 3∣ < 2 ϵ ⟹ 2∣ x − 3∣ < ϵ ⟹ ∣ ( 2 x − 1 ) − 5∣ < ϵ Therefore, lim x → 3 ( 2 x − 1 ) = 5 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 3} (2x - 1) = 5 x → 3 lim ( 2 x − 1 ) = 5 . ■ \blacksquare ■
Note
Example Prove that lim x → 2 x 2 = 4 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} x^2 = 4 x → 2 lim x 2 = 4 .
We need ∣ x 2 − 4 ∣ < ϵ |x^2 - 4| \lt \epsilon ∣ x 2 − 4∣ < ϵ whenever 0 < ∣ x − 2 ∣ < δ 0 \lt |x - 2| \lt \delta 0 < ∣ x − 2∣ < δ .
Note that ∣ x 2 − 4 ∣ = ∣ x − 2 ∣ ⋅ ∣ x + 2 ∣ |x^2 - 4| = |x - 2| \cdot |x + 2| ∣ x 2 − 4∣ = ∣ x − 2∣ ⋅ ∣ x + 2∣ .
If we restrict δ ≤ 1 \delta \le 1 δ ≤ 1 Then ∣ x − 2 ∣ < 1 |x - 2| \lt 1 ∣ x − 2∣ < 1 So 1 < x < 3 1 \lt x \lt 3 1 < x < 3 and ∣ x + 2 ∣ < 5 |x + 2| \lt 5 ∣ x + 2∣ < 5 .
Thus ∣ x 2 − 4 ∣ = ∣ x − 2 ∣ ⋅ ∣ x + 2 ∣ < 5 ∣ x − 2 ∣ |x^2 - 4| = |x - 2| \cdot |x + 2| \lt 5|x - 2| ∣ x 2 − 4∣ = ∣ x − 2∣ ⋅ ∣ x + 2∣ < 5∣ x − 2∣ .
Choose δ = min ( 1 , ϵ 5 ) \delta = \min\!\left(1, \frac{\epsilon}{5}\right) δ = min ( 1 , 5 ϵ ) .
Proof. Let ϵ > 0 \epsilon \gt 0 ϵ > 0 . Choose δ = min ( 1 , ϵ 5 ) \delta = \min\!\left(1, \frac{\epsilon}{5}\right) δ = min ( 1 , 5 ϵ ) . If 0 < ∣ x − 2 ∣ < δ 0 \lt |x - 2| \lt \delta 0 < ∣ x − 2∣ < δ Then:
∣ x 2 − 4 ∣ = ∣ x − 2 ∣ ⋅ ∣ x + 2 ∣ < δ ⋅ 5 ≤ ϵ 5 ⋅ 5 = ϵ |x^2 - 4| = |x - 2| \cdot |x + 2| \lt \delta \cdot 5 \le \frac{\epsilon}{5} \cdot 5 = \epsilon ∣ x 2 − 4∣ = ∣ x − 2∣ ⋅ ∣ x + 2∣ < δ ⋅ 5 ≤ 5 ϵ ⋅ 5 = ϵ Therefore, lim x → 2 x 2 = 4 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} x^2 = 4 x → 2 lim x 2 = 4 . ■ \blacksquare ■
Note
Example Prove that lim x → a x = a \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} \sqrt{x} = \sqrt{a} x → a lim x = a for a > 0 a \gt 0 a > 0 .
We need ∣ x − a ∣ < ϵ |\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{a}| \lt \epsilon ∣ x − a ∣ < ϵ whenever 0 < ∣ x − a ∣ < δ 0 \lt |x - a| \lt \delta 0 < ∣ x − a ∣ < δ .
Rationalise: ∣ x − a ∣ = ∣ x − a ∣ x + a ≤ ∣ x − a ∣ a |\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{a}| = \frac{|x - a|}{\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{a}} \le \frac{|x - a|}{\sqrt{a}} ∣ x − a ∣ = x + a ∣ x − a ∣ ≤ a ∣ x − a ∣ .
We want ∣ x − a ∣ a < ϵ \frac{|x - a|}{\sqrt{a}} \lt \epsilon a ∣ x − a ∣ < ϵ So ∣ x − a ∣ < ϵ a |x - a| \lt \epsilon\sqrt{a} ∣ x − a ∣ < ϵ a .
Choose δ = min ( a , ϵ a ) \delta = \min(a, \epsilon\sqrt{a}) δ = min ( a , ϵ a ) . The condition δ ≤ a \delta \le a δ ≤ a ensures x > 0 x \gt 0 x > 0 so that x \sqrt{x} x is defined.
Proof. Let ϵ > 0 \epsilon \gt 0 ϵ > 0 . Choose δ = min ( a , ϵ a ) \delta = \min(a, \epsilon\sqrt{a}) δ = min ( a , ϵ a ) . If 0 < ∣ x − a ∣ < δ 0 \lt |x - a| \lt \delta 0 < ∣ x − a ∣ < δ Then x > 0 x \gt 0 x > 0 and:
∣ x − a ∣ = ∣ x − a ∣ x + a ≤ ∣ x − a ∣ a < ϵ a a = ϵ |\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{a}| = \frac{|x - a|}{\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{a}} \le \frac{|x - a|}{\sqrt{a}} \lt \frac{\epsilon\sqrt{a}}{\sqrt{a}} = \epsilon ∣ x − a ∣ = x + a ∣ x − a ∣ ≤ a ∣ x − a ∣ < a ϵ a = ϵ Therefore, lim x → a x = a \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} \sqrt{x} = \sqrt{a} x → a lim x = a . ■ \blacksquare ■
The general approach is:
Start with ∣ f ( x ) − L ∣ |f(x) - L| ∣ f ( x ) − L ∣ and try to bound it in terms of ∣ x − a ∣ |x - a| ∣ x − a ∣ . If f f f involves products, use the “restrict delta” technique: bound each factor separately. If f f f involves roots, rationalise and use the fact that x + a ≥ a \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{a} \ge \sqrt{a} x + a ≥ a . Choose \delta = \min(\mathrm{bound, \epsilon / \mathrm{constant) to handle both the restriction and the ϵ \epsilon ϵ requirement. A function f f f is continuous at a a a if all three conditions hold:
f ( a ) f(a) f ( a ) is definedlim x → a f ( x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} f(x) x → a lim f ( x ) existslim x → a f ( x ) = f ( a ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a) x → a lim f ( x ) = f ( a ) Theorem. Every polynomial function is continuous everywhere. Every rational function is Continuous on its domain.
Theorem (Continuity of compositions). If g g g is continuous at a a a and f f f is continuous at g ( a ) g(a) g ( a ) Then f ∘ g f \circ g f ∘ g is continuous at a a a .
This theorem justifies statements like ”x 2 + 1 \sqrt{x^2 + 1} x 2 + 1 is continuous everywhere” — x 2 + 1 x^2 + 1 x 2 + 1 is a Polynomial (continuous everywhere) and x \sqrt{x} x is continuous at all positive values (and x 2 + 1 ≥ 1 > 0 x^2 + 1 \ge 1 \gt 0 x 2 + 1 ≥ 1 > 0 ).
Type Description Example Removable Limit exists but f ( a ) f(a) f ( a ) is undefined or f ( a ) ≠ lim x → a f ( x ) f(a) \ne \lim_{x \to a} f(x) f ( a ) = lim x → a f ( x ) f ( x ) = x 2 − 1 x − 1 f(x) = \frac{x^2 - 1}{x - 1} f ( x ) = x − 1 x 2 − 1 at x = 1 x=1 x = 1 Jump (Non-removable) One-sided limits exist but are not equal f ( x ) = ⌊ x ⌋ f(x) = \lfloor x \rfloor f ( x ) = ⌊ x ⌋ Infinite (Non-removable) Function approaches ± ∞ \pm\infty ± ∞ f ( x ) = 1 x f(x) = \frac{1}{x} f ( x ) = x 1 at x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 Oscillating Function oscillates without approaching a single value f ( x ) = sin ( 1 x ) f(x) = \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) f ( x ) = sin ( x 1 ) at x = 0 x=0 x = 0
If f f f is continuous on [ a , b ] [a, b] [ a , b ] and k k k is any number between f ( a ) f(a) f ( a ) and f ( b ) f(b) f ( b ) Then there exists At least one c ∈ ( a , b ) c \in (a, b) c ∈ ( a , b ) such that f ( c ) = k f(c) = k f ( c ) = k .
Note
Example Show that f ( x ) = x 3 + x − 1 f(x) = x^3 + x - 1 f ( x ) = x 3 + x − 1 has a root in ( 0 , 1 ) (0, 1) ( 0 , 1 ) .
f ( 0 ) = − 1 < 0 f(0) = -1 \lt 0 f ( 0 ) = − 1 < 0 and f ( 1 ) = 1 > 0 f(1) = 1 \gt 0 f ( 1 ) = 1 > 0 .
Since f f f is continuous on [ 0 , 1 ] [0, 1] [ 0 , 1 ] and 0 0 0 is between f ( 0 ) f(0) f ( 0 ) and f ( 1 ) f(1) f ( 1 ) By the IVT there exists c ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) c \in (0, 1) c ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) such that f ( c ) = 0 f(c) = 0 f ( c ) = 0 .
Application of IVT to bisection. The IVT motivates the bisection method for root-finding: if f ( a ) f(a) f ( a ) and f ( b ) f(b) f ( b ) have opposite signs, a root exists in ( a , b ) (a, b) ( a , b ) . Halving the interval and checking Signs converges to the root.
Note
Example Show that f ( x ) = e x − 3 − x f(x) = e^x - 3 - x f ( x ) = e x − 3 − x has at least one root in ( 1 , 2 ) (1, 2) ( 1 , 2 ) .
f ( 1 ) = e − 4 ≈ − 1.282 < 0 f(1) = e - 4 \approx -1.282 \lt 0 f ( 1 ) = e − 4 ≈ − 1.282 < 0 and f ( 2 ) = e 2 − 5 ≈ 2.389 > 0 f(2) = e^2 - 5 \approx 2.389 \gt 0 f ( 2 ) = e 2 − 5 ≈ 2.389 > 0 .
Since f f f is continuous (as a sum of continuous functions) on [ 1 , 2 ] [1, 2] [ 1 , 2 ] By the IVT there exists c ∈ ( 1 , 2 ) c \in (1, 2) c ∈ ( 1 , 2 ) such that f ( c ) = 0 f(c) = 0 f ( c ) = 0 . ■ \blacksquare ■
Corollary of the IVT. If f f f is continuous on [ a , b ] [a, b] [ a , b ] and f ( a ) ⋅ f ( b ) < 0 f(a) \cdot f(b) \lt 0 f ( a ) ⋅ f ( b ) < 0 Then f f f has At least one zero in ( a , b ) (a, b) ( a , b ) .
If f f f is continuous on a closed interval [ a , b ] [a, b] [ a , b ] Then f f f attains both an absolute maximum and an Absolute minimum on [ a , b ] [a, b] [ a , b ] .
Caution
On ( 0 , 1 ) (0, 1) ( 0 , 1 ) has no maximum, despite being continuous.
If f f f is continuous on a closed interval [ a , b ] [a, b] [ a , b ] Then f f f is bounded on [ a , b ] [a, b] [ a , b ] — that is, There exist real numbers m m m and M M M such that m ≤ f ( x ) ≤ M m \le f(x) \le M m ≤ f ( x ) ≤ M for all x ∈ [ a , b ] x \in [a, b] x ∈ [ a , b ] .
This follows directly from the EVT: the absolute minimum and maximum serve as the bounds.
If lim x → a + f ( x ) = ± ∞ \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a^+} f(x) = \pm\infty x → a + lim f ( x ) = ± ∞ or lim x → a − f ( x ) = ± ∞ \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a^-} f(x) = \pm\infty x → a − lim f ( x ) = ± ∞ Then x = a x = a x = a is a vertical asymptote.
For rational functions P ( x ) Q ( x ) \frac{P(x)}{Q(x)} Q ( x ) P ( x ) Vertical asymptotes occur at zeros of Q ( x ) Q(x) Q ( x ) that are Not also zeros of P ( x ) P(x) P ( x ) (after cancellation).
If lim x → ± ∞ f ( x ) = L \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \pm\infty} f(x) = L x → ± ∞ lim f ( x ) = L Then y = L y = L y = L is a horizontal asymptote. A function can have at most two horizontal asymptotes (one as x → ∞ x \to \infty x → ∞ One as x → − ∞ x \to -\infty x → − ∞ ). If deg P = deg Q + 1 \deg P = \deg Q + 1 deg P = deg Q + 1 in a rational function, perform polynomial long division. The quotient (excluding remainder) gives the slant asymptote.
Note
Example Find the asymptotes of f ( x ) = 2 x 2 + 3 x − 1 x + 1 \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{2x^2 + 3x - 1}{x + 1} f ( x ) = x + 1 2 x 2 + 3 x − 1 .
Vertical asymptote: Set denominator to zero: x + 1 = 0 ⟹ x = − 1 x + 1 = 0 \implies x = -1 x + 1 = 0 ⟹ x = − 1 .
Slant asymptote: Perform long division:
2 x 2 + 3 x − 1 x + 1 = 2 x + 1 − 2 x + 1 \frac{2x^2 + 3x - 1}{x + 1} = 2x + 1 - \frac{2}{x + 1} x + 1 2 x 2 + 3 x − 1 = 2 x + 1 − x + 1 2 The slant asymptote is y = 2 x + 1 y = 2x + 1 y = 2 x + 1 .
Note
Example Find the horizontal asymptotes of f ( x ) = 3 e x e x + 1 \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{3e^x}{e^x + 1} f ( x ) = e x + 1 3 e x .
As x → ∞ x \to \infty x → ∞ : Divide numerator and denominator by e x e^x e x :
3 1 + e − x → 3 1 + 0 = 3 \frac{3}{1 + e^{-x}} \to \frac{3}{1 + 0} = 3 1 + e − x 3 → 1 + 0 3 = 3 As x → − ∞ x \to -\infty x → − ∞ : Divide numerator and denominator by e x e^x e x :
3 e x e x + 1 → 0 0 + 1 = 0 \frac{3e^x}{e^x + 1} \to \frac{0}{0 + 1} = 0 e x + 1 3 e x → 0 + 1 0 = 0 Horizontal asymptotes: y = 3 y = 3 y = 3 (as x → ∞ x \to \infty x → ∞ ) and y = 0 y = 0 y = 0 (as x → − ∞ x \to -\infty x → − ∞ ).
If lim x → a f ( x ) g ( x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} x → a lim g ( x ) f ( x ) produces the indeterminate form 0 0 \frac{0}{0} 0 0 or ± ∞ ± ∞ \frac{\pm\infty}{\pm\infty} ± ∞ ± ∞ And f f f and g g g are differentiable near a a a with g ′ ( x ) ≠ 0 g'(x) \ne 0 g ′ ( x ) = 0 near a a a Then:
lim x → a f ( x ) g ( x ) = lim x → a f ′ ( x ) g ′ ( x ) \lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \lim_{x \to a} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} x → a lim g ( x ) f ( x ) = x → a lim g ′ ( x ) f ′ ( x ) Provided the limit on the right exists.
When to use L’Hopital’s Rule. It applies ONLY to 0 0 \frac{0}{0} 0 0 or ± ∞ ± ∞ \frac{\pm\infty}{\pm\infty} ± ∞ ± ∞ Forms. Using it on a determinate form (e.g., 3 5 \frac{3}{5} 5 3 ) is an error.
When L’Hopital’s Rule fails. If the limit lim x → a f ′ ( x ) g ′ ( x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} x → a lim g ′ ( x ) f ′ ( x ) does Not exist, this does NOT mean the original limit does not exist. L’Hopital’s Rule only gives a Conclusion when the right-hand limit exists (or is ± ∞ \pm\infty ± ∞ ).
Note
Example Find lim x → 0 1 − cos x x 2 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1 - \cos x}{x^2} x → 0 lim x 2 1 − cos x .
Direct substitution gives 0 0 \frac{0}{0} 0 0 :
lim x → 0 1 − cos x x 2 = lim x → 0 sin x 2 x = lim x → 0 cos x 2 = 1 2 \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1 - \cos x}{x^2} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{2x} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\cos x}{2} = \frac{1}{2} x → 0 lim x 2 1 − cos x = x → 0 lim 2 x sin x = x → 0 lim 2 cos x = 2 1 Note that we applied L’Hopital’s Rule twice, since the second attempt still gave 0 0 \frac{0}{0} 0 0 .
Note
Example Find lim x → 0 + x ln x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0^+} x \ln x x → 0 + lim x ln x .
This has the form 0 ⋅ ( − ∞ ) 0 \cdot (-\infty) 0 ⋅ ( − ∞ ) Which is indeterminate. Rewrite as a quotient:
X ln x = ln x 1 / x X \ln x = \frac{\ln x}{1/x} X ln x = 1/ x ln x Now it is − ∞ ∞ \frac{-\infty}{\infty} ∞ − ∞ . Apply L’Hopital’s Rule:
lim x → 0 + ln x 1 / x = lim x → 0 + 1 / x − 1 / x 2 = lim x → 0 + ( − x ) = 0 \lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac{\ln x}{1/x} = \lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac{1/x}{-1/x^2} = \lim_{x \to 0^+} (-x) = 0 x → 0 + lim 1/ x ln x = x → 0 + lim − 1/ x 2 1/ x = x → 0 + lim ( − x ) = 0 Note
Example Let f ( x ) = { x 2 + 1 x < 2 3 x − 1 x ≥ 2 f(x) = \begin{cases} x^2 + 1 & x \lt 2 \\ 3x - 1 & x \ge 2 \end{cases} f ( x ) = { x 2 + 1 3 x − 1 x < 2 x ≥ 2 .
Find lim x → 2 f ( x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} f(x) x → 2 lim f ( x ) and determine if f f f is continuous at x = 2 x = 2 x = 2 .
Left-hand limit: lim x → 2 − f ( x ) = lim x → 2 − ( x 2 + 1 ) = 5 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2^-} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 2^-} (x^2 + 1) = 5 x → 2 − lim f ( x ) = x → 2 − lim ( x 2 + 1 ) = 5 .
Right-hand limit: lim x → 2 + f ( x ) = lim x → 2 + ( 3 x − 1 ) = 5 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2^+} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 2^+} (3x - 1) = 5 x → 2 + lim f ( x ) = x → 2 + lim ( 3 x − 1 ) = 5 .
Since both one-sided limits equal 5: lim x → 2 f ( x ) = 5 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} f(x) = 5 x → 2 lim f ( x ) = 5 .
Check continuity: f ( 2 ) = 3 ( 2 ) − 1 = 5 = lim x → 2 f ( x ) f(2) = 3(2) - 1 = 5 = \lim_{x \to 2} f(x) f ( 2 ) = 3 ( 2 ) − 1 = 5 = lim x → 2 f ( x ) .
Therefore, f f f is continuous at x = 2 x = 2 x = 2 .
Note
Example Let g ( x ) = { x 2 − 4 x − 2 x ≠ 2 k x = 2 g(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^2 - 4}{x - 2} & x \neq 2 \\ k & x = 2 \end{cases} g ( x ) = { x − 2 x 2 − 4 k x = 2 x = 2 .
Find k k k such that g g g is continuous at x = 2 x = 2 x = 2 .
lim x → 2 x 2 − 4 x − 2 = lim x → 2 ( x − 2 ) ( x + 2 ) x − 2 = 4 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^2 - 4}{x - 2} = \lim_{x \to 2} \frac{(x-2)(x+2)}{x-2} = 4 x → 2 lim x − 2 x 2 − 4 = x → 2 lim x − 2 ( x − 2 ) ( x + 2 ) = 4 .
For continuity: k = g ( 2 ) = 4 k = g(2) = 4 k = g ( 2 ) = 4 .
Note
Example Let h ( x ) = { x 2 + b x + 1 x ≤ 0 2 x + 3 x > 0 h(x) = \begin{cases} x^2 + bx + 1 & x \le 0 \\ 2x + 3 & x \gt 0 \end{cases} h ( x ) = { x 2 + b x + 1 2 x + 3 x ≤ 0 x > 0 .
Find b b b such that h h h is continuous at x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 .
Left-hand limit: lim x → 0 − h ( x ) = 0 + 0 + 1 = 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0^-} h(x) = 0 + 0 + 1 = 1 x → 0 − lim h ( x ) = 0 + 0 + 1 = 1 .
Right-hand limit: lim x → 0 + h ( x ) = 3 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0^+} h(x) = 3 x → 0 + lim h ( x ) = 3 .
For continuity: 1 = 3 1 = 3 1 = 3 Which is impossible. No value of b b b makes h h h continuous at x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 .
This example demonstrates that continuity at a junction point of a piecewise function is not always Achievable — on whether the one-sided limits can be made to agree.
Confusing the value of a function at a point with its limit. The limit at a a a does not depend on f ( a ) f(a) f ( a ) at all. A function can have a limit at a point where it is undefined.Assuming lim x → a f ( x ) g ( x ) = lim x → a f ( x ) lim x → a g ( x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac{\lim_{x \to a} f(x)}{\lim_{x \to a} g(x)} x → a lim g ( x ) f ( x ) = lim x → a g ( x ) lim x → a f ( x ) when the denominator limit is zero. This is invalid when the denominator limit is zero.Forgetting to check both one-sided limits for piecewise functions and absolute values.Misapplying L’Hopital’s Rule when the limit is not in indeterminate form. Always verify 0 0 \frac{0}{0} 0 0 or ± ∞ ± ∞ \frac{\pm\infty}{\pm\infty} ± ∞ ± ∞ before applying.Claiming a limit exists when only one-sided limits are checked. Both must agree.Using thousands separators in math mode. Write 1000000 1000000 1000000 in math expressions, not 1 , 000 , 000 1,000,000 1 , 000 , 000 .Using angle brackets in math mode. Use < \lt < and > \gt > commands instead of < and >.Forgetting the EVT requires a closed interval. Open intervals do not guarantee maxima/minima.Assuming L’Hopital’s Rule always works. If lim f ′ ( x ) g ′ ( x ) \displaystyle\lim \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} lim g ′ ( x ) f ′ ( x ) does not exist, you cannot conclude anything about the original limit. Try algebraic methods instead.Applying the product rule for limits to indeterminate products. The limit lim x → 0 + x ln x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0^+} x \ln x x → 0 + lim x ln x is not 0 ⋅ ( − ∞ ) = 0 0 \cdot (-\infty) = 0 0 ⋅ ( − ∞ ) = 0 ; it requires rewriting as a quotient and applying L’Hopital’s Rule.Forgetting the “restrict delta” step in epsilon-delta proofs for nonlinear functions. You must bound ∣ x − a ∣ |x - a| ∣ x − a ∣ before bounding the other factors.Find lim x → 1 x 3 − 1 x − 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x^3 - 1}{x - 1} x → 1 lim x − 1 x 3 − 1 by factoring.
Prove using the epsilon-delta definition that lim x → 4 x = 2 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 4} \sqrt{x} = 2 x → 4 lim x = 2 .
Determine all points of discontinuity for f ( x ) = x 2 + x − 6 x 2 − 9 f(x) = \frac{x^2 + x - 6}{x^2 - 9} f ( x ) = x 2 − 9 x 2 + x − 6 and classify each.
Find the horizontal and vertical asymptotes of f ( x ) = 3 x 2 − 2 x + 1 x 2 − 4 \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{3x^2 - 2x + 1}{x^2 - 4} f ( x ) = x 2 − 4 3 x 2 − 2 x + 1 .
Use L’Hopital’s Rule to find lim x → ∞ ln x x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{\ln x}{\sqrt{x}} x → ∞ lim x ln x .
Let f ( x ) = { x 2 − 9 x − 3 x ≠ 3 k x = 3 f(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^2 - 9}{x - 3} & x \ne 3 \\ k & x = 3 \end{cases} f ( x ) = { x − 3 x 2 − 9 k x = 3 x = 3 . Find the value of k k k that makes f f f continuous at x = 3 x = 3 x = 3 .
Use the squeeze theorem to find lim x → 0 x cos ( 1 x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x \cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) x → 0 lim x cos ( x 1 ) .
Given f ( x ) = x 3 − 3 x + 1 f(x) = x^3 - 3x + 1 f ( x ) = x 3 − 3 x + 1 Use the IVT to show there is at least one root in the interval ( 1 , 2 ) (1, 2) ( 1 , 2 ) .
Find lim x → 0 tan x x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\tan x}{x} x → 0 lim x tan x .
Find lim x → 1 x − 1 x 3 − 1 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{\sqrt{x} - 1}{\sqrt[3]{x} - 1} x → 1 lim 3 x − 1 x − 1 .
Classify each discontinuity of f ( x ) = x 2 − x x 2 − 1 \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{x^2 - x}{x^2 - 1} f ( x ) = x 2 − 1 x 2 − x .
Use the IVT to prove that f ( x ) = e x − 3 − x f(x) = e^x - 3 - x f ( x ) = e x − 3 − x has at least one root in the interval ( 1 , 2 ) (1, 2) ( 1 , 2 ) .
Find lim x → 0 e x − 1 − x x 2 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - 1 - x}{x^2} x → 0 lim x 2 e x − 1 − x .
Prove that lim x → 3 1 x = 1 3 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 3} \frac{1}{x} = \frac{1}{3} x → 3 lim x 1 = 3 1 using the epsilon-delta definition.
Find the value of c c c such that f ( x ) = { c x 2 + 2 x x < 1 3 x − 1 x ≥ 1 f(x) = \begin{cases} cx^2 + 2x & x \lt 1 \\ 3x - 1 & x \ge 1 \end{cases} f ( x ) = { c x 2 + 2 x 3 x − 1 x < 1 x ≥ 1 is continuous at x = 1 x = 1 x = 1 .
Evaluate lim x → 0 sin 2 x x 2 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin^2 x}{x^2} x → 0 lim x 2 sin 2 x .
Find lim x → ∞ ( x 2 + x − x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to \infty} \left(\sqrt{x^2 + x} - x\right) x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + x − x ) .
Determine whether lim x → 0 1 x 2 sin ( 1 x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{x^2}\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) x → 0 lim x 2 1 sin ( x 1 ) exists.
Question 1: Epsilon-delta proof Using the epsilon-delta definition, prove that lim x → 2 ( 3 x − 1 ) = 5 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} (3x - 1) = 5 x → 2 lim ( 3 x − 1 ) = 5 .
Answer We need to show: for every ϵ > 0 \epsilon \gt 0 ϵ > 0 There exists a δ > 0 \delta \gt 0 δ > 0 such that if 0 < ∣ x − 2 ∣ < δ 0 \lt |x - 2| \lt \delta 0 < ∣ x − 2∣ < δ Then ∣ ( 3 x − 1 ) − 5 ∣ < ϵ |(3x - 1) - 5| \lt \epsilon ∣ ( 3 x − 1 ) − 5∣ < ϵ .
∣ ( 3 x − 1 ) − 5 ∣ = ∣ 3 x − 6 ∣ = 3 ∣ x − 2 ∣ |(3x - 1) - 5| = |3x - 6| = 3|x - 2| ∣ ( 3 x − 1 ) − 5∣ = ∣3 x − 6∣ = 3∣ x − 2∣ .
We need 3 ∣ x − 2 ∣ < ϵ 3|x - 2| \lt \epsilon 3∣ x − 2∣ < ϵ So ∣ x − 2 ∣ < ϵ / 3 |x - 2| \lt \epsilon/3 ∣ x − 2∣ < ϵ /3 .
Choose δ = ϵ / 3 \delta = \epsilon/3 δ = ϵ /3 . Then if 0 < ∣ x − 2 ∣ < δ 0 \lt |x - 2| \lt \delta 0 < ∣ x − 2∣ < δ :
∣ ( 3 x − 1 ) − 5 ∣ = 3 ∣ x − 2 ∣ < 3 δ = 3 ( ϵ / 3 ) = ϵ |(3x - 1) - 5| = 3|x - 2| \lt 3\delta = 3(\epsilon/3) = \epsilon ∣ ( 3 x − 1 ) − 5∣ = 3∣ x − 2∣ < 3 δ = 3 ( ϵ /3 ) = ϵ .
Therefore, lim x → 2 ( 3 x − 1 ) = 5 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} (3x - 1) = 5 x → 2 lim ( 3 x − 1 ) = 5 .
Question 2: Limits involving trigonometric functions Evaluate lim x → 0 1 − cos x x sin x \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1 - \cos x}{x \sin x} x → 0 lim x sin x 1 − cos x .
Answer Multiply numerator and denominator by 1 + cos x 1 + \cos x 1 + cos x :
lim x → 0 ( 1 − cos x ) ( 1 + cos x ) x sin x ( 1 + cos x ) = lim x → 0 sin 2 x x sin x ( 1 + cos x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{(1 - \cos x)(1 + \cos x)}{x \sin x(1 + \cos x)} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin^2 x}{x \sin x(1 + \cos x)} x → 0 lim x sin x ( 1 + cos x ) ( 1 − cos x ) ( 1 + cos x ) = x → 0 lim x sin x ( 1 + cos x ) sin 2 x
= lim x → 0 sin x x ( 1 + cos x ) = lim x → 0 sin x x ⋅ 1 1 + cos x = 1 ⋅ 1 1 + 1 = 1 2 = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x(1 + \cos x)} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} \cdot \frac{1}{1 + \cos x} = 1 \cdot \frac{1}{1 + 1} = \frac{1}{2} = lim x → 0 x ( 1 + c o s x ) s i n x = lim x → 0 x s i n x ⋅ 1 + c o s x 1 = 1 ⋅ 1 + 1 1 = 2 1 .
Question 3: Continuity of a piecewise function Determine whether the following function is continuous at x = 1 x = 1 x = 1 :
f(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^2 - 1}{x - 1} & \mathrm{if x \ne 1 \\ 4 & \mathrm{if x = 1 \end{cases}
Answer Check three conditions:
f ( 1 ) = 4 f(1) = 4 f ( 1 ) = 4 (defined).lim x → 1 f ( x ) = lim x → 1 x 2 − 1 x − 1 = lim x → 1 ( x − 1 ) ( x + 1 ) x − 1 = lim x → 1 ( x + 1 ) = 2 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 1} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x^2 - 1}{x - 1} = \lim_{x \to 1} \frac{(x-1)(x+1)}{x-1} = \lim_{x \to 1} (x + 1) = 2 x → 1 lim f ( x ) = x → 1 lim x − 1 x 2 − 1 = x → 1 lim x − 1 ( x − 1 ) ( x + 1 ) = x → 1 lim ( x + 1 ) = 2 .lim x → 1 f ( x ) = 2 ≠ f ( 1 ) = 4 \lim_{x \to 1} f(x) = 2 \ne f(1) = 4 lim x → 1 f ( x ) = 2 = f ( 1 ) = 4 .Since the limit does not equal the function value, f f f is NOT continuous at x = 1 x = 1 x = 1 . To make it Continuous, f ( 1 ) f(1) f ( 1 ) should be redefined as 2 2 2 .
Question 4: Intermediate Value Theorem application Prove that the equation x 5 − 5 x + 1 = 0 x^5 - 5x + 1 = 0 x 5 − 5 x + 1 = 0 has at least one root in the interval ( 0 , 1 ) (0, 1) ( 0 , 1 ) .
Answer Let f ( x ) = x 5 − 5 x + 1 f(x) = x^5 - 5x + 1 f ( x ) = x 5 − 5 x + 1 . This is a polynomial, so it is continuous everywhere.
f ( 0 ) = 0 − 0 + 1 = 1 > 0 f(0) = 0 - 0 + 1 = 1 \gt 0 f ( 0 ) = 0 − 0 + 1 = 1 > 0 .
f ( 1 ) = 1 − 5 + 1 = − 3 < 0 f(1) = 1 - 5 + 1 = -3 \lt 0 f ( 1 ) = 1 − 5 + 1 = − 3 < 0 .
Since f f f is continuous on [ 0 , 1 ] [0, 1] [ 0 , 1 ] and f ( 0 ) > 0 f(0) \gt 0 f ( 0 ) > 0 and f ( 1 ) < 0 f(1) \lt 0 f ( 1 ) < 0 By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists at least one c ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) c \in (0, 1) c ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) such that f ( c ) = 0 f(c) = 0 f ( c ) = 0 .
Question 5: Squeeze theorem Evaluate lim x → 0 x 2 sin ( 1 x ) \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x^2 \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) x → 0 lim x 2 sin ( x 1 ) .
Answer Since − 1 ≤ sin ( 1 x ) ≤ 1 -1 \le \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \le 1 − 1 ≤ sin ( x 1 ) ≤ 1 for all x ≠ 0 x \ne 0 x = 0 :
− x 2 ≤ x 2 sin ( 1 x ) ≤ x 2 -x^2 \le x^2 \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \le x^2 − x 2 ≤ x 2 sin ( x 1 ) ≤ x 2 .
lim x → 0 ( − x 2 ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} (-x^2) = 0 x → 0 lim ( − x 2 ) = 0 and lim x → 0 x 2 = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x^2 = 0 x → 0 lim x 2 = 0 .
By the Squeeze Theorem: lim x → 0 x 2 sin ( 1 x ) = 0 \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} x^2 \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = 0 x → 0 lim x 2 sin ( x 1 ) = 0 .
Tip
hardest questions within the AP specification for this topic, each with a full worked solution.
Unit tests probe edge cases and common misconceptions. Integration tests combine Limits and Continuity with other AP Calculus topics to test synthesis under exam conditions.
See for instructions on self-marking and building a personal test matrix.
A[1_Limits And Continuity] --> B[Key Concepts]
A --> D[Practical Applications]
B --> E[Fundamental definitions]
D --> G[Real-world usage]
This topic covers the mathematical techniques and concepts related to limits and continuity, including key theorems, methods, and problem-solving approaches.
Key concepts include:
quadratic equations and the discriminant simultaneous equations polynomial division and the factor theorem partial fractions binomial expansion Regular practice with a variety of question types is essential to build fluency and confidence in applying these mathematical techniques.
Worked examples demonstrating the application of key concepts are covered in the detailed sub-pages linked above.
The GPS navigator analogy: Limits describe where a function is heading, not where it actually arrives. Imagine driving toward a destination — limits tell you the direction and destination of your journey, even if there’s a pothole (discontinuity) at that exact spot.
Why it matters: Limits are the foundation of all calculus. Without understanding limits, derivatives (instantaneous rates of change) and integrals (accumulation of quantities) cannot be properly understood or applied.
The key insight: A function can approach a value without ever reaching it, and that approaching behaviour is what matters for calculus.
Derivatives — The derivative is defined as a limit of a difference quotient, making limits the foundation of differential calculus.Integrals — The definite integral is defined as a limit of Riemann sums, connecting limits to the accumulation of quantities.Sequences and Series — Convergence of sequences and series relies on the same limit concepts that underpin continuity.AP Physics — Kinematics : Instantaneous velocity and acceleration are defined as limits of average velocity and acceleration over shrinking time intervals.AP Physics — Work, Energy, and Power : The work integral is defined as a limit of Riemann sums, directly applying limit concepts to physical quantities.